Approaches to outlining a novel are sometimes bemoaned by authors who decry how such an orderly approach can work against the rather addictive journey of discovery (surprise!) allowed by pantsing through a plot. After the high of flying by the seat of one’s writing pants often comes the dreadful lows of massive rewrites. Other novelists swear by the usefulness of outlining, and such approaches are as varied as there are novelists who write them. Such is the simultaneous glory and agony of any process. You might as well give at least a couple of the outlining techniques listed in this roundup post a try. Doing so will give you more tools in your writer’s toolbelt and likely lead to increased drafting efficiency with practice.
This year, I will be covering a revision exercise on photography and writing, punctuating dialogue, rendering thoughts, using past perfect, and bringing setting to life. Feel free to explore Word Bank’s archive of writing posts. In particular, you may find How to Get the Writing Done of interest.
Approaches to Outlining a Novel
Once upon a time, I wrote a novel. I struggled mightily during the process, and it was largely because I had no idea how the story should end. I thought if I just kept writing, the ending would come to me eventually. It didn’t. This was probably because I didn’t really understand what was motivating my main characters. Yeah, it’s safe to say it was a hot mess! That novel now sits tucked away in a folder on my computer. I’ve since gone on to consider whether or not I have it in me to write a memoir, and some of the approaches given below can be applied to writing about one’s life consider the best memoirs often read like novels. Being an extremely organized person who has always felt I am a better editor than writer, I now know any longer creative works I produce will require a detailed outline to see me through.
Plot isn’t complicated. If a story doesn’t follow some manner of a three-act structure, it might be more akin to a vignette or a character sketch. Have fun trying these on for size. I know I will!
The 30-Minute Outline
If you’re exclaiming, “Yuck! I hate outlining! It’s sooooo stupid and sooooo time consuming!” Never fear, plotting out the main points of one’s book doesn’t have to be overly involved. It just needs to be detailed enough to see if the story works or needs tweaking. Start off by writing a one-sentence summary (5 min.) and then expand that to a handful of sentences that explore the three-act structure (10 min). Next, write one sentence on the main characters (5 min). Finally go back and expand each sentence written for the three-act portion into a full paragraph (10 min.). Read more here.
Three-Point Structure
For writers with an aversion to heavy structure, this approach covers the basics to help keep the big picture organized without the fear of becoming too predictable. First, an event has to occur that presents the main character with a problem to solve or a need to fulfill. Second, attempts must be made to fix that problem or alleviate that need while varying degrees of failure are thrown into the mix. Third, resolution is achieved when the problem or need in question is brought to some level of closure. The level of detail can vary greatly, and genre expectations should kept be in mind. Read more here.
Three-Act Structure
This familiar format results in a satisfying story with a clear beginning, middle, and end. The first act comprises roughly 25% of the story and consists of exposition to set the scene and an inciting incident that introduces the primary conflict when the main character makes their first significant choice. The second act contains rising action that consists of 50% of the story and can be broken into reactions, a midpoint shift, and further upping of the stakes. The third act entails the remaining 25% of the story when a new plan emerges that leads to the climax before events wrap up with some degree of resolution and denouement. Read more here.
Michael Hague’s Six Stage Plot Structure
Hague’s framework hangs upon the notion of turning points. These points remain the same no matter the type of story and they also occur at the same point of a story regardless of its length. The first stage is the initial setup that leads an opportunity at the 10% mark. The second stage introduces the new situation that leads to a change in plans at the 25% point. The third stage covers what progress is being made, and this leads to the point of no return at the halfway mark. The fourth stage introduces more complications and even higher stakes where a major setback is going to occur 75% of the way into the plot. The fifth stage represents the final push that leads to the climax somewhere around 90-99% of the story being done. Finally, the sixth stage shows the aftermath and a glimpse into how the character goes on. Read more here.
Blake Snyder’s Save the Cat Beat Sheet
Like Hague’s technique mentioned above, Snyder’s was originally applied to screenplays, but both can be readily applied to fiction. This approach bears much in common with the three-act structure (surprise!) with the turning points referred to as beats. A screenplay has less wiggle room than a novel, but the beats will still be fairly precise. The story begins with the first act and includes an opening image and set up with the theme often being explicitly stated. A catalyst sets events in motion, and the main character debates with themself to decide what needs to be done.
The first half of the second act entails another choice being made referred to as the “break into two.” Some so-called fun and games will transpire and any B Story subplots start shaping up as the midpoint false victory or defeat takes place. The second half of the second act cover the bad guys closing in, a sense of all being lost, a dark night of the soul where protagonist does some soul searching to find a solution to the problem. Act three commences with “break into three” when the main character knows what must be done, which leads to the finale or climax where the antagonist is defeated. A final image then cues the audience in on where the protagonist is now. Read more here.
Randy Ingermanson’s Snowflake Method
Ingermanson is a former software architect, so his method for writing novels stems from his background. He notes creativity can’t be taught, but that learning how to manage it can be. This plot design process entails ten steps. Step one involves taking an hour to write a sentence summary of the novel. Step two then takes another hour to expand that sentence into a paragraph. Step three entails taking an hour to write a one-page summary of each major character. Step four takes each sentence of the novel summary paragraph and devotes several hours to bumping each one into a full paragraph. Step five covers character descriptions, allotting one page for major characters and half a page for minor ones. This is a synopses that tells the story from each POV.
In step six, one week is devoted to lengthening the one-page plot summary into a four-page synopsis. Step seven covers a week where detailed character charts are created. Step eight shapes the four-page synopsis into a list one-line scenes over the course of a week or so (Ingermanson’s comments about the tendency to fear spreadsheets is priceless) The ninth step is stated as being optional, and it takes each one-line scene into multiple paragraphs to describe the scene. Finally, at step ten, it’s time to let the draft rip! Some writers end up tripling their writing speed this way. Software has also been created to assist in this approach. Read more here.
Joseph Campbell’s Hero’s Journey
The hero going on an adventure is the basic myth format that has existed for centuries, and much of the three-act structure matches up with this approach as well. The opening scene establishes the hero’s ordinary world and shows an element of uncertainty. A call to adventure occurs, but the protagonist first refuses, and this reveals a flaw or weakness. A meeting with a mentor then takes place, and a threshold is crossed for the journey to begin. The hero then undergoes trials and tests with allies and enemies as dealing with the big issue approaches. The hero’s greatest fear is faced in the ordeal, and a reward appears for facing death. On the road back, the hero is ready to get home, but often is being chased. The resurrection tests the hero once more and results in coming out clean on the other side. At this point, the hero either go home or keep adventuring. By returning with the elixir, the hero has been transformed. Read more here.
This list is by no means exhaustive, plus the way various approaches to outlining a novel are applied can make a difference as well. Some writers like to work with notecards that can be shuffled around, others like sticking boatloads of post-its on the wall, and yet others scribble story ideas in notebooks. Any outline can be performed digitally as well in programs like Word, Scrivener, or OneNote. The glory and agony of any process lies precisely in its nature of not being a one-size-fits-all endeavor. An outlining process provides a structure that takes on the flavor the writer give it as they make it their own. While I could never outline using Post-its, I can readily use electronic note cards in Scrivener. I don’t like stacks of “real stuff” to keep track of. And yet, I prefer to jot ideas down in a notebook as opposed in a software program. I would rather die (yes die!) than write a story out in longhand.
Writers are certainly a quirky lot when it comes to how they get the writing done.
What other approaches to outlining a novel have you tried? What method work best for you?
Please share responsibly. Jeri Walker, 2018. Posts may contain affiliate links. Image credit: Book Spines Vintage.
I’m doing something a little different than any techniques you’ve shown here. I wrote a summary of the whole story that is five paragraphs. I’ve split up the story into three parts and am writing outlines for the first part right now splitting it into scenes. After I have written the 1st part of the story, I’ll split the second part into scenes and outline them.
What I have found out is I get bored doing one thing for very long so I’m splitting it all out so the boredom doesn’t do me in.
Glynis, thanks for sharing your plotting process. So long as you start with that one big-picture summary that is five paragraphs, that seems to be giving you enough direction to keep going and then tackling a more detailed outline for each of the three parts when the time comes.
Jeri — I didn’t know there were established approaches to writing a novel. All involve a lot of heavy lifting. I admire those writers who churn out a novel every year. It’s too daunting for me to even contemplate.
The weakness of many novels, in my view, are the endings. There is not enough thought given to the denouement — how will this end? I find that often the author will quickly arrive at an ending that doesn’t support the rest of the novel. It happens too quickly as if the author is thinking, “Well, I’ve arrived at the required 320 pages, so let’s finish this thing!” What do you think?
I agree that the ends of novels can often go out with a whimper. One of my favorite sets of final pages occurs in Norman MacLean’s A River Runs Through It.
This post reassures me that writing a novel is quite challenging though for some writers, it is like a cake walk, who finish it within a year! The ending has to be arrived at slowly and logically or the reader feels cheated and I have felt so in many modern novels either with abrupt ending or carrying it forward to a sequel! I think sequels are inspired from this instinct of avoiding an ending! Some pay no attention to characterisation and have events thrown in
This post contains excellent tips for writing a wholesome novel. I appreciate the effort that must have gone into it, with all the links you have provided. Stay blessed.
Balroop, you make a good point when it comes to sequels. Although, if well done, each book in a sequel should be able to be read as a self-contained unit. I’ve never really been drawn to book series very much, but I really got hooked on Jean Auel’s Clan of the Cave Bear series back in the day.
As you know, my mystery editor, I am a panster and hate outlines with a passion. That said, I’ve never so keenly understood how important an outline is to any story until now. In working on the second mystery, I started it to get an idea where I wanted it to go and am now working on the outline. You can teach me!
RoseMary, that’s great to hear you’ve gone over to the dark side of outlining!
I’ll admit, it’s been a really long time since I’ve written any fiction. But I was definitely one of those, “Yuck – I hate outlining!” ones. But I did it nonetheless. Because otherwise, I wouldn’t have any direction. Believe me – I know from some bad experiences.
I never had much of a technique. So I’m glad you presented so much on this. I would think it’s so tempting to just “be creative” when your starting out. But I imagine that leads to stories that get lost in the middle, or are missing the key events needed to keep it moving and fulfilling.
Erica, bad experiences really are the best teachers. While I’ve written a good number of short stories, I’ve only tried a novel once. I can help others write novels, but when it came to my own, I just dove in with not much of a plan. Needless to say, I got discouraged. I think I’ve lived and learned enough now that it will go much more smoothly when I pick it back up again. I’ll likely give a few different outline approaches a go before I start drafting again.
I have never written a novel and rarely write any fiction at all. But I’m pretty sure that if I had been so inclined there is next to no chance I would have started with an outline. That is until I read your post.
Ken, that’s great you find my post convincing!
What a great idea to start your memoir with an outline. It would be easy to assume you just follow the timeline of your life, but it makes sense that an outline would help give purpose to your writing. Another tip I would never have thought of!
Meredith, even reality needs shaped when it’s turned into a book. To do a rough draft of a memoir in chronological order makes good sense. In that process, it will become apparent how the right timing with various plot points can be emphasized to strengthen the story.
Writing a novel out in longhand would be a terrible chore – I agree with you there, Jeri. The hero journey is a classic so I was pleased you included it in the discussion here. I like “free writes” when I’m trying to get to endings that don’t seem to come easily (as happened with your book, you said). I find that this exercise unblocks my mind from any barriers that I may not have even known were there so I can be more creative and in the moment. Great post!
Christy, I think I’m most compelled to try the Snowflake method given to its freewriting-friendly nature.
Three-Point Structure and Three-Act Structure seems to work really well to outline the most important narrative sequences. Basic narrative conglomerates are easier to handle. Later on you can move on to more complex approaches, right!?.
I love that you included Campbell´s Hero´s Journey… There is a book you could enjoy (Colleen Chesebro recommended it to me and I used it in my last post to try to figure out some sort of narrative logic in the Minor Arcana Taror cards). The book is called “The Writer and the Hero´s Journey”. Author: Rob Parnell. You can find the free PDF online. Excellent post dear Jeri 🙂 Love & best wishes
Aqui, more complex approaches can depend on the genre as well. At a writing conference I once attended, a thriller author shared he often writes 100-plus page outlines for his novels in order to keep track of all the intricacies. I’ll definitely take a look at Parnell’s book. Thanks!
This is awesome. I had no idea there were so many ways of getting a book’s structure organized. I find this really useful.
Debra, dive in and give one or two of the approaches a try!
What a great summary of all those books on my shelf — under one “roof”! Thanks.
Julie, I enjoyed collecting all of the links to the various approaches. It helped me narrow down what will likely work best for me as a writing, which is the snowflake method.
Thanks so much Jeri for this excellent post on outlining. I’m sharing! 🙂
DG, thanks for the share 🙂
This is an interesting look at outlining. I’m not sure which method would work best for me and it might be a combination of techniques. I particularly like that step 5 of the snowflake method results in one-page synopses that tells the story from each POV. I can see that being useful in identifying or validating key plot points.
Donna, I’m rather keen on the one-page POV synopsis from different characters as well.
Yikes! So many different approaches. I tend to go with something like the 6 point structure, but with a bit more detail. In order for the book to really work for me, there does still have to be wiggle room though. Plot too tightly, and I’m asking to have to rewrite the whole book anyway. Characters are fickle beasts.
Crystal, characters definitely have a fickle side. At times, writing fiction can feel a bit like trying to herd cats 😉
Next novel… I’m trying the Three Act Outline approach.
Candy, another novel? Go you!
I’m terrible at plotting and sticking to a plan, and though I understand structure and love it, I’m never sure how to apply it to my story. Maybe I can have someone look at it after I’m done to see if I hit the right points at the right time.
Loni, having another set of eyes on an outline is a great idea.