Review Etiquette: It’s not all about you!

Book Review Etiquette Tip #1: Don’t be a self-promoting smarty pants.

The following is not meant to mock fellow reviewers. The goal is to quote portions of questionable Amazon reviews in order to point out how to ultimately write a better book review. In the interest of all involved, the reviewers shall remain nameless…

jeriwb, jeri walker-bickett, lost girl road, ghost story

Woman Reading A Book by Petr Kratochvil

The excerpts provided below are from one reviewer, but of various books. The writer’s tone immediately struck me as off-putting. It’s important to note a standard convention of review writing is to minimize the use of “I” within the text. After all, writing a review isn’t all about you!

I couldn’t get in to the characters, and I’ve read, as someone with a doctorate, super complicated books in English and French.

While I, @name on Twitter, am an author, and actually love some of the [series name] books this one was the biggest disappointment.

The book moved along quickly and I finished it in less than five hours total; which means it’s YA to me. The vocab, the plot line, it’s all just too easy, so you can rapidly read through it. I did notice some typos, but for an Indie book, not enough to care about all that much.

The other books have so many flaws, I never have had the energy to write reviews for them, but since I’ve been helping Indie Authors on Twitter under my @name moniker, I thought I should start slogging away on reviews…

As an avid reader, published author, and some one like [author’s last name], who has an MFA; and is currently promoting indie authors on Twitter as @name I’m giving this book five stars with the caveat…

Today’s featured reviewer above mentions their Twitter handle relentlessly. It’s a thin ruse for promoting indie authors, when in reality it’s just a ploy to shove their name in a potential reader’s face. That alone makes the reviews difficult to stomach, but when coupled with the reviewer’s smarty pants tone, most readers will be unlikely to seek out material written by that reviewer.

Lesson Learned: Readers of reviews don’t care about you, your degrees, your own books, your Twitter presence, or your speed-reading capabilities. What review readers care about are the strengths and weaknesses in a potential read, which frankly don’t have a damn thing to do with your personal lot in life. Good review writing should speak for itself and not need you to be your own best cheerleader.

But then again, what do I know? I only earned a mere master’s degree…

Thanks for visiting. Share the blog love and leave a comment below or post this entry to your favorite social media website!

Sign-up via the email or RSS option in the sidebar to receive JeriWB’s latest posts. You can also follow JeriWB via the various social media platforms listed on this website. Let’s learn together!

Quote of the Day: Why not spread some words of wisdom and copy the words below to your facebook or google+ page?

jeriwb, jeri walker-bickett, facebook status images, facebook statuses, facebook quotes, how to write a book review

16 thoughts on “Review Etiquette: It’s not all about you!

  1. You are right, book reviews should be about the book with a few references to the author for writing it. If the reader want to know more they can go to the author’s page or click on the reviewers name.

  2. Great article, Jeri. Some reviewers even create lists (like Authors Behaving Badly) on Goodreads to push their weight around, leaving incomplete bad reviews on 200+ books. I just complimented a reader who left an honest and clear 2-star review of my book on Goodreads. She took time to articulate what she liked and disliked. And took time to read the book.
    But authors have to do their part as well by putting their best work out there, and must be receptive to criticism as as well as praise.

    • C.D., thanks for stopping by and commenting. I’ve been on GoodReads for about a year and a half, but I’m just starting to explore it more in depth. I think it totally throws some people off track when a writer compliments a reviewer for giving valuable criticism. Critical feedback is so valuable, in any area.

  3. As a new reviewer but avid reader – it was very helpful to read your post. You’re right, I have read way too many reviews that are all about the writer not the book written. It is obviously just their way of self promotion and they aren’t really helping the book at all.

    • J, thanks for stopping by. I think it really shows when a writer enjoys writing reviews. There should be no need for the reviewer to try to further their own interests in the context of the review itself. Why so many reviewers don’t realize their writing speaks for itself has always floored me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge